Tuesday, 3 April 2012

Secondary kids taught with Janet and John!

I just had to write this having read the article in the Daily Mail saturday 31st March.
Normally I applaud initiatives such as this one but on this occasion I have to tell you that far from this being a eureka moment this has already been done. I do not want to decry Miss Atwood's efforts or the initiative of the Sirius Academy. I was appalled to see them on television, how humiliating to be identified so. Its not their fault.
Over 15 years ago my wife was a special needs teacher in a secondary school. Children in main stream education had various disabilities to learning but with appropriate tuition great strides were made and most of them achieved an appropriate level of achievement to enable them to function in society. Some even gained qualifications.
At the same time there were a number of, so called, "normal" children who also suffered from a lack of achievement but not innate ability. Often they were the more disruptive elements and school refusers who had missed out on education for various reasons.
My main point is, yes they may have reading ages of 5 or so but they are 11 plus. You cannot demean them by giving them "baby" books to learn to read. Imagine how the Hard nuts will react.
So my wife used the various texts/materials that are available to encourage them to read. Yes she even taught Shakespeare to the SEN children. The key is "differentiated work". Most teachers are either not trained how to do this or do not have the time or inclination.
The school did not fund this remedial work as such but by using a small amount of the special needs budget my wife obtained materials and taught these children. I was appalled to see them on television, how humiliating to be identified so. Its not their fault. There was some resistance from the "normal" children - who were reluctant to enter a class of "numpties" as the SEN kids were known. With appropriate encouragement the children attended special lessons (sometimes 1:1) for just half an hour or so. Their reading and arithmetic came on and after say a year of this they were brought up sufficiently to return to normal classes and continue with their peers. Having been given a boost they could continue on their own.
Other aspects of this were, and I do not wish to demean Miss Atwood, but she does not have the experience, the material my wife used was in fact so good that "normal" children often got these books from the library for themselves. Yes they only took minutes to read but they enjoyed the stories and the other children gained a lot in self esteem now they were able to "read" real books. Sometimes the SEN children got better Marks in English than the others in their lessons,for their understanding of Shakespeare as taught by my Wife. This was in fact a testament to the fact of how these children were being taught. Small groups with appropriately differentiated work, excellent resources and attention from staff.
Another aspect was, that given the school refusers/disruptive elements who traditionally were excluded - after being persuaded to attend lessons with my Wife, they became engaged and even enthusiastic about her lessons, (although some would still not attend their normal lessons or behave in them). Given time their attitudes changed, they enjoyed learning and again some were able to gain (appropriate) qualifications (not necessarily GCSE's). Then go on to obtain employment.
This effort really does demand resources and appropriate techniques - NOT giving Janet and John to 12 year olds!
I sincerely believe that it is appalling that almost one fifth of student s are still leaving school officially "illiterate", but with appropriately directed tuition they can be brought up to a useful standard to function in society. Really it is the primary schools that are failing to address this but again lack of resources and appropriate tuition results in this situation. Given we are where we are it needs urgent action like Sirius is taking. Often it is these "dregs" who are the ones that society shuns and they end up being the rioters because they have no hope or aspiration. If you're never going to get anything then why not just take.
Perhaps the Sirius Academy would appreciate some consultancy from my Wife to take this project to the next level?

Thursday, 29 March 2012

Pasties/Pies/Pensioners and Petrol

All this bashing about pies and 20% VAT.

Who cares, buy 'em cold and warm 'em in the Microwave - or do without
Better for your waistline.

What about the pensioners? No pensions, more tax on pensions, no interest on savings, tax on interest, endowments slashed so can't afford to pay off mortgage, fuel up again now you can't get it 'cos everyone's filled their tanks!

Wish I had an electric car but I can't afford it!

I just hope David and George have the secret of eternal youth otherwise they'll get old and poor.

Oh I forgot ex Prime Ministers get a salary for life!!

How's that?

Wednesday, 21 March 2012

George and Co do it again - the Budget

Lots to moan about, since when was any Budget Good News?

My point is about the Child Benefit, this time fair enough why give "rich" folk benefits? If you've over £50k coming in you should jolly well be able to afford kids. Some people have kids solely to get more benefit but that's another issue.

Promises - I hate broken promises, doesn't hat make them liars? (George and Dave?).

They promised they'd support Marriage and families by restoring some sort of Married Tax allowance. They would help Families with one earner. E.g. one doesn't work to look after the children (excellent idea better for the upbringing - see IDS). Where is it?

Now Child Benefit - did George not say "where one of the household earns more than £50k they'd take away Child Benefit"? How do they define the "household" - is it Married couples (gay or not), or just sharing a house, how do you prove it. What about where there are more than 2 earners in a Household? Sharing a house etc. etc. If they can define a "Household" for Child Benefit lets define Married Couples and give them a COMBINED Personal Allowance for whoever earns the most (if they want).

Come on George, Dave and Nick - honour your promise.

Tuesday, 20 March 2012

Mothers to lose £68 a week!

Oh dear here we go again - Save the Children are sticking up for "poor mothers".

Read this from the BBC, Single mothers with 3 children are struggling on their meagre income, thus,

"It's incredibly hard bringing up three kids on £370 a week - losing almost a fifth of that will push many families over the edge."

Sorry if I'm not sympathetic but £370 works out at over £19000 pa and that's CASH! If you earn just over £20k and then have to pay Tax, NI and Pension contributions you end up with about £15k. Now a working person on £20 would expect to be reasonably well off and may have 3 kids. Yet we fund these mothers with kids to tune of nearly half as much again and NOT working! Are we barmy?

This society apparently rewards single mums - have 3 plus kids and no need to work, how else can you net £19? They need their house (rents paid on top) and Council Tax paid no doubt. They can afford all the mod cons, mobile phones (the kids have one each) , broadband, computers (the kids have one each) Sky, wide screen flat TV, Microwave, cooker, washer, dishwasher, carpets curtains, decorating done, gardener to help, etc. etc, Kids go to nursery school so mum can shop/hob nob with friends. Sorry, Supermarket delivers on-line orders. What else?

All this on our Taxes (the working ones). No wonder Dave and George want to tax more not less.

Come on - this is sickening. Its actually worse than the Bankers Bonuses because these people are parasites. This is a real stab in the back for all decent hard working people. At least Bankers do actually "work" for their money. I know its not fair but its true.

All I can say is, if you've lost your job it is not fair. You should get benefits relative to your earnings - to start with, after all what is National Insurance for - insurance, when things go wrong you claim? Not benefits by right forever - just so you can maintain your standard of living - and WHAT living eh!

Thursday, 15 March 2012

No Fly Holidays

I want to go on one of these "no fly holidays".

Don't you just hate it when you are bugged by flies?

SO if these holidays promise "no flies" great.

Tuesday, 13 March 2012

Record Fuel Prices

Petrol and Diesel at an all time high!!

Get used to it. The Government aren't going to give you anything. They can'f if they did, what 2 or 3p a litre maybe, then oil goes p 2/3/4p a litre. No gain.

Where do you think they get the money to fund the bankers? US!!
Finally, OIL IS RUNNING OUT! - Reality.

What do we do?
  1. travel less.
  2. Live nearer work.
  3. get a more fuel efficient car.
  4. ride a bike
  5. get an Electric car
Think about this, when we all drive ELECTRIC cars, what will the Government do for Duty on Fuel that its NOT getting?

Be worried.

Sunday, 11 March 2012

Child Benefit reoved for Higher Rate Tax payers

I wish. I wish I WAS a higher rate tax payer to have my Child benefit removed.

Too right I'm afraid.

Basically IF you want children then its up to you to decide if you can afford them NOT the state to subsidise you when you have them

Have you noticed all the dolers can have loads of kids at the drop of a hat! Why? Because kids-pounds!

Simples!

Day was when if you were poor the kids got by, no shoes, living on porridge, and wearing rags, but they were 'appy!

World is upside down now.