50 shades of pornographic.
This film 50 Shades of Grey - is much hyped recently. even Breakfast TV was "laughing" coyly about it.
OK You're an adult watch it if you want but I suggest DON'T - here's why, apart from it being a mediocre film.
Have they read the book, have any of them? How do these people reconcile their attitude to porn, what about the BBC - promoting it when children are undoubtedly watching? If its not PORN why is it rated 18?
It is a scandal and people (and BBC) should be ashamed.
In the same week a very good article in Saturday's Daily Mail by Sarah Vine highlighted how easy it is to get to hard core porn on the internet and our children are looking at it and being damaged for life by it. They can access stuff that tragically and irreversibly distorts their young minds in their formative years of their view of society. I know because I've seen it. I don't mean that I go surfing for porn, but in my job I have had to "investigate" employees that were circulating Porn via email. We had to collect the evidence, I had to "see" it to check what it was and compile it for management who ultimately dismissed the culprits including a manager.
Believe me some images are so vile that you don't want to see them, and having seen them you can't get them out of your mind even if you want to. I am pretty well balanced and tried to stay detached but it is hard.
If it involves children remember if they are shown in it it is not a victimless crime - these children are being abused, the viewers are ABUSING them too by proxy.
If no one wanted to see this filth then the kids would not get abused.
That is what "pornography" means, actually we need a word meaning worse than pornography because some of this stuff is unbelievably corrupting.
YOU DON'T WANT CHILDREN TO SEE IT.
WE MUST STOP IT..
Showing posts with label porn. Show all posts
Showing posts with label porn. Show all posts
Wednesday, 18 February 2015
50 types of pornography
Monday, 20 October 2014
Paedophiles viewing online porn IS as bad as child molestation
Amanda Plattell is right that John Grisham is wrong to defend his buddy, she is also right saying "But isn’t that exactly what any man who accesses images of child abuse is — a pervert? They may not harm children themselves, but their search for images of younger and younger looking boys and girls implicitly supports an evil paedophile industry that does — and which trades the images for profits or for perverted pleasure. In legal terms, that makes the voyeurs complicit in the crime."
Then she is WRONG saying that
Then she is WRONG saying that
"while it may be true that not every man who seeks out underage pornography is a danger to children"
EVERY MAN who seeks out underage porn IS a danger to children.
EVERY MAN who seeks out underage porn IS a danger to children.
How on earth does she think the Porn gets there? Children are abused to produce the PORN. IT is abuse by PROXY.
Why can't the police catch them all?
Sophisticated Internet technology can track everyones surfing habits from their computer to every porn site and they know exactly what you have looked at. From the ISP records they know who pays the Bills, so come on Police lets track them down. You don't even have to leave your comfy office and face the nasty criminals its like catching speeders - using CCTV and cameras.
NO EXCUSES.
Labels:
abuse,
amanda plattell,
crime,
gay,
internet,
man,
paedophiles,
porn,
sex
Monday, 7 October 2013
Lottery - half a chance
Lottery . At a stroke they've halved everybody's chances. What annoyed me is i don't gamble but do lottery online. I updated my filter that the isp provides after all the publicity about porn. I don't want to go to dodgy sites accidentally . Then later found the lottery was blocked . I had to unlock gambling. This seems wrong somehow. I want all the other gambling blocked just access to the lottery .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)