I totally disagree with using a mobile phone whilst driving. Its dangerous - how can you control a car with the other hand holding a phone? I often encounter cars around here (Lincolnshire) with the driver having a mobile clamped to his ear, driving with his elbows! Why, you see they don't get caught. There's no deterrent in fines and points if you stand ZERO chance of getting caught, no police around here.
Its like drink driving, people now almost universally agree NOT to do it. If you do it you are shunned as a pariah. Its genuine antisocial behaviour. Worse you could kill someone or even yourself. Its exactly the same with a mobile but when are we gong to treat people the same as a society as DOL drivers?
I also think the same about smoking. If it started today what would folk say about lighting a piece of weed wrapped in paper, holding it in one hand taking it off the wheel to whilst you were driving , then puffing on it breathing in the smoke! It would be banned. You can't have naked flames in a car! how stupid and dangerous.
Anyway, I watched a film the other night, and have you noticed how in America they often show the actors driving and using a mobile phone! (cell phone). Is it NOT illegal in America? I think the censors should rate these films/programmes X if they show a patently illegal and dangerous act in a film in this country. Or be forced to put a warning on screen, "this film depicts driving whilst using a mobile phone which is contrary to UK Law". If its part of the story like anything else (killing people is illegal but we all know that), then let them show it but like supposedly the rating stops children seeing it and being influenced (like killing) only adults should be allowed to see it.
Any answers on US law?
Showing posts with label censor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label censor. Show all posts
Saturday, 26 January 2013
Driving while using a mobile phone
Labels:
antisocial,
car,
cell,
censor,
censorship,
dol,
drink,
driving,
film,
illegal,
law,
mobile,
phone,
rating,
smoke,
x
Thursday, 24 January 2013
Censorship and history
Recent repeat of classic BBC Comedy Fawlty Towers was censored by BBC. If it was OK when it was first shown why can't we see it now? Yes there were racist terms used but that's what people aid then. No malice was intended it was just a name. Surely offence is caused by how the "name" is used? Any word can be used in an offensive manner if you choose to use it.
Classic is Guy Gibson, his dog was called Nigger. He was a black labrador. Can I say "black" labrador or is that offensive to the dog? Has the dog taken offence is he upset? Actually he's dead now. so doesn't care. In the remake of the Dambusters film they want to rename his dog! so as not to be offensive.
Its all stupid, Isn't it?
Classic is Guy Gibson, his dog was called Nigger. He was a black labrador. Can I say "black" labrador or is that offensive to the dog? Has the dog taken offence is he upset? Actually he's dead now. so doesn't care. In the remake of the Dambusters film they want to rename his dog! so as not to be offensive.
Its all stupid, Isn't it?
Labels:
bbc,
black,
censor,
dambusters,
fawlty towers,
film,
labrador,
nigger,
racist
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)