I don't understand how all these so-called Illegal Immigrants can "sneak" across hiding in Cross channel Ferries? Where can they go for heavens sake when on the Ferry.
I say, when under way - as I remember every passenger has to leave their vehicles on the Car-decks. So when everyone has gone lets flood the car deck with anti-vermin poisonous gas. We don't want any pests coming into our country like "colorado beetle", poisonous spiders, snakes or foxes bringing Rabies etc.. So lets sterilise the vehicles, after all everyone is safe on Deck - ideal time to do it.
No one would be foolish enough to stay on the car-deck would they?
Oh - you'd have to allow pets out to go somewhere of course - can't be inhumane can we?
Showing posts with label illegal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label illegal. Show all posts
Wednesday, 8 October 2014
Wednesday, 25 June 2014
Travellers move on?
Here we go again Travellers set up camp somewhere illegally but bizarly it takes days to evict them legally.
Skegness Car Park - I hope they all got their tickets from the machines properly and were parked in the correct bays? Ha Ha!! Bet not. Will they get fined? Of course not.
Why do some laws apply to some people (residents who pay Council Tax) but not others?

If they want to camp - there are loads of sites along the coast. East Lincolnshire is the Caravan Capital. Bet they don't want to pay either its their Human Right?
Victory for Villagers! Good on you, except they're breaking the law!
Skegness Car Park - I hope they all got their tickets from the machines properly and were parked in the correct bays? Ha Ha!! Bet not. Will they get fined? Of course not.
Why do some laws apply to some people (residents who pay Council Tax) but not others?
If they want to camp - there are loads of sites along the coast. East Lincolnshire is the Caravan Capital. Bet they don't want to pay either its their Human Right?
Victory for Villagers! Good on you, except they're breaking the law!
Tuesday, 4 June 2013
Underage sex - the perpetrators are Paedophiles
So at last someone has been actually prosecuted for having sex with a girl under 16.
It has always puzzled me that sex under age is illegal but yet there ar so many girls under 16 having babies. Is the father ever prosecuted? Not usually. Yet if he's over 18 and technically an adult then sex with an under 16 is having sex with a child.
Why do these men not get jailed as paedophile?
I admit that if the girl is 15 and the boy is 16 accidents can happen we've all been there?
So what I'm saying is that we should have zero tolerance of this behaviour its just the thin end of the wedge. Where would you stop.
Imagine a teacher of 35 has sex with a pupil 15 - is he a paedophile? Certainly he's broken the law and should be rightly punished. He is in a position of trust, loco parentis. My argument is if you're an adult and you have sex with a child under 16 its illegal.
Maybe if there were more prosecutions the message would get across?
It has always puzzled me that sex under age is illegal but yet there ar so many girls under 16 having babies. Is the father ever prosecuted? Not usually. Yet if he's over 18 and technically an adult then sex with an under 16 is having sex with a child.
Why do these men not get jailed as paedophile?
I admit that if the girl is 15 and the boy is 16 accidents can happen we've all been there?
So what I'm saying is that we should have zero tolerance of this behaviour its just the thin end of the wedge. Where would you stop.
Imagine a teacher of 35 has sex with a pupil 15 - is he a paedophile? Certainly he's broken the law and should be rightly punished. He is in a position of trust, loco parentis. My argument is if you're an adult and you have sex with a child under 16 its illegal.
Maybe if there were more prosecutions the message would get across?
Saturday, 26 January 2013
Driving while using a mobile phone
I totally disagree with using a mobile phone whilst driving. Its dangerous - how can you control a car with the other hand holding a phone? I often encounter cars around here (Lincolnshire) with the driver having a mobile clamped to his ear, driving with his elbows! Why, you see they don't get caught. There's no deterrent in fines and points if you stand ZERO chance of getting caught, no police around here.
Its like drink driving, people now almost universally agree NOT to do it. If you do it you are shunned as a pariah. Its genuine antisocial behaviour. Worse you could kill someone or even yourself. Its exactly the same with a mobile but when are we gong to treat people the same as a society as DOL drivers?
I also think the same about smoking. If it started today what would folk say about lighting a piece of weed wrapped in paper, holding it in one hand taking it off the wheel to whilst you were driving , then puffing on it breathing in the smoke! It would be banned. You can't have naked flames in a car! how stupid and dangerous.
Anyway, I watched a film the other night, and have you noticed how in America they often show the actors driving and using a mobile phone! (cell phone). Is it NOT illegal in America? I think the censors should rate these films/programmes X if they show a patently illegal and dangerous act in a film in this country. Or be forced to put a warning on screen, "this film depicts driving whilst using a mobile phone which is contrary to UK Law". If its part of the story like anything else (killing people is illegal but we all know that), then let them show it but like supposedly the rating stops children seeing it and being influenced (like killing) only adults should be allowed to see it.
Any answers on US law?
Its like drink driving, people now almost universally agree NOT to do it. If you do it you are shunned as a pariah. Its genuine antisocial behaviour. Worse you could kill someone or even yourself. Its exactly the same with a mobile but when are we gong to treat people the same as a society as DOL drivers?
I also think the same about smoking. If it started today what would folk say about lighting a piece of weed wrapped in paper, holding it in one hand taking it off the wheel to whilst you were driving , then puffing on it breathing in the smoke! It would be banned. You can't have naked flames in a car! how stupid and dangerous.
Anyway, I watched a film the other night, and have you noticed how in America they often show the actors driving and using a mobile phone! (cell phone). Is it NOT illegal in America? I think the censors should rate these films/programmes X if they show a patently illegal and dangerous act in a film in this country. Or be forced to put a warning on screen, "this film depicts driving whilst using a mobile phone which is contrary to UK Law". If its part of the story like anything else (killing people is illegal but we all know that), then let them show it but like supposedly the rating stops children seeing it and being influenced (like killing) only adults should be allowed to see it.
Any answers on US law?
Labels:
antisocial,
car,
cell,
censor,
censorship,
dol,
drink,
driving,
film,
illegal,
law,
mobile,
phone,
rating,
smoke,
x
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)