Showing posts with label entertainment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label entertainment. Show all posts
Wednesday, 20 May 2015
Lets save every household £145
Lets all start watching catch-up TV and ditch the licence. WHy should we have an "entertainment Tax" to fund the BBC? Its appalling we pay £3.5billion for the likes of Jeremy Clarkson and co to earn millions for his tosh. Privatise the BBC I say and lets put the money to use in the NHS?
Thursday, 26 February 2015
BBC - Entertainment tax to be abolished
Why should we all in 21st Century Britain pay a tax to be entertained? A faceless Quango of backslapping n'er do wells who can't get a proper job runan organisation bleeding £3.5 billion from the long suffering tax payers of Britain.
Unlike Councils there's no one elected to oversee what the BBC is doing yet they have that vast income and no cut backs. Councils on the otherhand look after children, the elderly and sick and have less and less money to do it.
The whole system is SICK.
Its just not RIGHT or FAIR!
Why should millionaires pay exactly the same for their TV as a little old pensioner of 74?
SKY doesn't get taxpayers money (well apart form the £5mill to show BBC programmes etc.).
END IT ALL - PRIVATISE THE BBC LIKE THE POST OFFICE.
Unlike Councils there's no one elected to oversee what the BBC is doing yet they have that vast income and no cut backs. Councils on the otherhand look after children, the elderly and sick and have less and less money to do it.
The whole system is SICK.
Its just not RIGHT or FAIR!
Why should millionaires pay exactly the same for their TV as a little old pensioner of 74?
SKY doesn't get taxpayers money (well apart form the £5mill to show BBC programmes etc.).
END IT ALL - PRIVATISE THE BBC LIKE THE POST OFFICE.
Sunday, 6 April 2014
No More Brucie?
So Sir Bruce is leaving Strictly. Very sad, Strictly Come Dancing will never be the same without him.
Worse though please do NOT let Claudia Winkleman take over. She's not an entertainer. I'd rather watch paint dry.
If she does then this household will never watch it again.
I actually think the BBC wants to take it off. Heaven knows why when it consistently outrates the opposition but then since when has the BBC been logical.
PRIVATISE the BBC. We souldn't be forced to pay £145 + a year to view entertainment. Its ridiculous
Think what the Government could do with £32 billion pounds - find a cure for Alzhemers perhaps.
John Barrowman for Strictly
Worse though please do NOT let Claudia Winkleman take over. She's not an entertainer. I'd rather watch paint dry.
If she does then this household will never watch it again.
I actually think the BBC wants to take it off. Heaven knows why when it consistently outrates the opposition but then since when has the BBC been logical.
PRIVATISE the BBC. We souldn't be forced to pay £145 + a year to view entertainment. Its ridiculous
Think what the Government could do with £32 billion pounds - find a cure for Alzhemers perhaps.
John Barrowman for Strictly
Wednesday, 5 March 2014
BBC - trying to save money?
Making BBC 3 online to save money?
Well why not go the whole hog? Privatise the BBC and save every household £145.50 a year PLEASE.
Why should they get £32 billion a year of our money for ENTERTAINMENT?
Entertainment tax - Mr os"Borne Conspiracy" - take note - we want FREEDOM to CHOOSE - TV or not TV.
Thanks.
Well why not go the whole hog? Privatise the BBC and save every household £145.50 a year PLEASE.
Why should they get £32 billion a year of our money for ENTERTAINMENT?
Entertainment tax - Mr os"Borne Conspiracy" - take note - we want FREEDOM to CHOOSE - TV or not TV.
Thanks.
Monday, 3 March 2014
About time they Privatised the BBC
Then they can do what they like. This is our money. How dare Lord Hall say its Value for money. I DON'T WANT TO PAY ANYTHING!
THIS IS AN ENTERTAINMENT (?) TAX.
Lord Hall has been keen to argue that the BBC provides value for money and in a speech to the Oxford Media Convention last week he said a BBC survey had shown that some viewers would happily pay between £15 and £20 a month, compared to the £12 currently paid.
If it was your local council paying 6 figure sums to staff they'd soon be sacked. How does the BBC get away with it? It has got to stop. I choos NOT to watch SKy. but they don't cost the taxpayer anything. Let the BBC stand in th ecommercial world I say.
They could provide 1 public service TV and radio channel from general taxation. Let every household be £145.50 better off - we need it for our fuel bills.
THIS IS AN ENTERTAINMENT (?) TAX.
Lord Hall has been keen to argue that the BBC provides value for money and in a speech to the Oxford Media Convention last week he said a BBC survey had shown that some viewers would happily pay between £15 and £20 a month, compared to the £12 currently paid.
If it was your local council paying 6 figure sums to staff they'd soon be sacked. How does the BBC get away with it? It has got to stop. I choos NOT to watch SKy. but they don't cost the taxpayer anything. Let the BBC stand in th ecommercial world I say.
They could provide 1 public service TV and radio channel from general taxation. Let every household be £145.50 better off - we need it for our fuel bills.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)